Today I read about how in 2003 the supreme court overruled all sodomy bans in the case of Lawrence v. Texas. Justice Scalia wrote a dissent where he mentions how states should be allowed to ban anal and oral sex. It made me wonder why Scalia has no problem with penis-on-penis action (e.g. docking, frotting, etc.) Scalia says in his dissent that he has "nothing against homosexuals, or any other group, promoting their agenda through normal democratic means." So I guess penis-on-penis action is "normal democratic means" to Anthony Scalia. Pretty weird Scalia. Pretty weird.
I personally think sodomy should be legalized and taxed.
I personally think sodomy should be legalized and taxed.
No comments:
Post a Comment